Markets & Investing Discipline
The CLARITY Act's failure in the Senate, and a string of single-tweet crypto crashes this year, raise the same question: whose hands do you want your long-term savings in? A researched look at what experts say changes now, and why real, established businesses hold up differently.
Published 2026-09-18 · Educational information only
On September 15, the U.S. Senate failed — again — to advance the CLARITY Act, the bill meant to give crypto its first real federal rulebook. It’s a useful moment to ask a bigger question than “what happens to crypto regulation now.” The real question is whose hands you want your long-term money in: an asset class whose price can move on a single tweet or tariff announcement, or businesses with real operations, real earnings, and years of performance behind them.
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (H.R. 3633) would have formally split oversight of the crypto market between the SEC and the CFTC, giving the smaller CFTC the bulk of the authority. It passed the House in July 2025 by a wide 294–134 margin, and the Senate Banking Committee advanced it 15–9 in May 2026. It stalled over ethics language addressing President Trump’s personal crypto holdings — a revised version he agreed to in July 2026 was rejected by Democrats as leaving loopholes open through intermediaries. On September 15, the Senate fell 11 votes short of the 60 needed just to open debate. An OKX board member warned that if the bill doesn’t pass before the midterms, a change in House control could mean years of continued regulatory conflict rather than a resolution either way.
Bitcoin’s own legal status barely moves either way — it’s already treated as a commodity, and that was expected to continue regardless of the bill’s outcome. What the industry actually loses is clarity everywhere else: exchanges, brokers, custody providers, and the thousands of smaller tokens that were hoping for a defined federal rulebook now go back to having their rules decided case by case by the SEC and CFTC, with no legislative floor under them. Analysts following the vote expect institutional adoption to slow further while banks and asset managers wait for legal certainty that, after this vote, is further away than it looked a few months ago.
Even with clear rules, crypto has a structural feature traditional markets mostly don’t: its price reacts violently to what one or two people say, in real time, regardless of anything happening in the underlying business. This year alone has produced blunt examples. When President Trump announced sweeping European tariffs on January 19, roughly $875 million in leveraged crypto positions were liquidated within 24 hours, and Bitcoin dropped nearly $4,000 in a single hour. A further tariff increase on February 23 pushed Bitcoin below $65,000. Neither move had anything to do with blockchain technology, adoption, or earnings — they were reactions to a policy announcement from one person. Elon Musk’s influence has followed a similar, if fading, pattern: a casual February reply about SpaceX possibly sending “a literal dogecoin to the literal moon” added nearly 20% to Dogecoin’s price within a day, even as the coin remained down roughly 60% from its highs. The bigger point isn’t that Musk or Trump specifically are the risk — it’s that an asset class this sensitive to any single high-profile statement is, by nature, harder to plan a retirement or a child’s education around than one that isn’t.
This isn’t just a narrative — it shows up directly in the data. Bitcoin’s 10-year average annualized volatility is about 46%, roughly 4.8 times the S&P 500’s approximately 10%. Its worst peak-to-trough drawdowns have run as steep as 94% (2011) and 86% (2013–2015), with even its more “mature” 2022 bear market falling nearly 77% — compared with the S&P 500’s worst drawdown this century, about 56%, during the 2008–2009 financial crisis. That volatility has been compressing in recent years as the market matures, but it remains in a different category entirely. It’s a large part of why many financial advisors frame crypto as a 1% to 2% allocation at most inside a diversified portfolio — beyond roughly 5%, Bitcoin’s volatility starts to dominate the entire portfolio’s risk profile, whatever else you hold alongside it.
A large or mid-cap company with physical infrastructure, decades of earnings history, and audited financial statements doesn’t reprice 20% because of a social media post. Its value is tied to real cash flow, real assets, and a track record that gets tested every quarter through actual reporting — not to sentiment or a leverage cascade. That’s not a guarantee against loss; established companies fall too, sometimes sharply. But the reasons tend to be visible and tied to the business itself, not a single unrelated headline from a public figure with no fiduciary duty to you. As certified financial planner Douglas Boneparth has put it, when a market’s primary motivation moves from speculation toward genuine portfolio construction, that’s a sign of maturity — and by that measure, the businesses that have been through multiple market cycles, with the balance sheets and physical footprint to show for it, have already gotten there.
None of this is an argument that crypto has no place in a portfolio — a small, deliberate allocation is a reasonable choice for some people, and plenty of credible advisors frame it exactly that way. It’s an argument about where the core of a long-term plan should actually sit: in established, diversified, real-economy holdings that don’t move 15% because of one person’s press release, rather than assets whose price depends on staying downstream of whatever the loudest voice in the room says next. If you’re not sure how much of your own portfolio is exposed to that kind of headline risk, that’s a worthwhile question to bring to a 30-minute session.
Curious what steady, registered-account investing could look like over time? Try the free TFSA Calculator or Retirement Calculator for an illustrative long-term growth estimate.
This article is for general education only and is not personalized financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and equity markets carry risk, including the risk of loss, and past volatility or performance is not a guarantee of future results. Portfolio allocation decisions depend on your individual circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance — speak with a qualified advisor before making investment decisions.
Start with a 30-minute session or protection review. No guaranteed outcomes are promised; the goal is to understand your situation and possible next steps.
Book a 30-Minute Session